My family frequently makes fun of me for what they see as my
complete and utter lack of a sweet tooth. They just don’t understand how two
scoops of Kahlua Brownie Fudge can leave me cold. Or how I can pass on the
tiramisu. Or do without the strawberry-glazed cheesecake. As far as they’re
concerned, there’s no such thing as a too sweet dessert.
Which puts me in mind of Paul Simon’s “one man’s ceiling is
another man’s floor.”
What they call a good dessert—a chocolate-brownie sundae,
cream-filled cannoli, baklava dripping with honey—I call saccharine-sweet. What
I call a good dessert—walnut-black pepper biscotti, dark-chocolate-covered
coffee beans, lemon sorbet—they call spicy, bitter, or sour. If it ain’t sweet,
it ain’t dessert, they tell me.
But, I argue back, think about this: the word dessert has nothing to do with sweet. Nothing
whatsoever. It comes from the Middle French dessert
which meant “last course,” or, literally, “the removal of what has been
served,” from desservir, “to clear
the table.” Fruit and cheese, for instance, were often the last things served
and so, I argue, qualify as dessert. Technically, anything can be considered
dessert if it’s served last.
But that’s a technicality. In reality, if you’re going to
serve a dessert to almost anyone other than me, it had better be sweet.
Once I even tried researching the matter online. “Why do
people want sweet desserts?” I typed in. Apparently six years ago, someone
asked the same question and received the following responses: “What other kind
of dessert is there beside sweet
desserts?” “Because sugar tastes good and that’s [sic] the way taste buds are.”
Hands down, my favorite reply was: “Is this a trick question??”
The more I researched the matter, the more “scientific”
evidence I discovered, all explaining why my family craves sugar. Because evolutionarily,
our species sensed that sweet foods are more nutrient-rich than bitter ones
(but wait: aren’t we told that kale is the über-vegetable?). Because breast-milk
is sweet and so from infancy on, sweet is our favorite taste.
I even came across an explanation of why some people crave
more sugar than others. According to a group of geneticists from Toronto, “people
with a certain DNA difference in their SLCa2 gene ate more sugar than people
with other versions. The researchers hypothesize that these folks may have
brains that are less sensitive to the amount of sugar in the blood. Which means
they may need to eat more sugar to feel full.”
By this logic, it’s not my
family’s fault that they can’t control themselves in a pastry shop or ice cream
parlor. It’s genetic.
Here's a thought. If you, like me, lack the SLCa2 mutation, let me know what your
favorite dessert is. There’s power in numbers. Maybe, just maybe, we can
petition for walnut-black pepper biscotti or (fill in the blank) to join the
ranks of the cannoli and tiramisu on the dessert menus of the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment